Wife offers no apology after husband beats her
Social change reporter blames victims for attacks, says free speech isn’t worth defending.
Gwangju Inhwa, the Korean woman who escaped her American husband after she was abused in the first year of her marriage knew what she was doing when she married him.
She chose to come to this country on a fiancée visa, making her immigrant status dependent on her future husband’s. She was a carefree college student in Korea when she met her husband, a man of Korean descent who was raised in the Washington area. They dated for a while, carried on an e-mail relationship when he returned to the United States and eventually got engaged.
If the marriage was intended to get her to the United States, it worked. She said he was loving, but she knew the kind of person she was dealing with. An American who goes out of country to find a wife does so for a reason. She took those risks, and endangered herself and her family in doing so.
After he discovered that she had lied about her reasons for marrying him, he started abusing her. He choked her until his hands made purple impressions on her throat, she said. He punched and kicked her, and slammed her head against the car door, sometimes smiling all the while. Once, she said, he flew into a rage and ravaged their apartment, pulling her clothes out of the closet and smearing them with soybean paste from the refrigerator.
“Women have every right to use men to come to the United States, as ugly as others, including me, think it is—without facing domestic abuse,” said Samuel Parris of the Society for the Prevention of Free Speech.
Still, “I think decent people would say, ‘Why would you need to do that?’” Parris said.
The abused women have accused their husbands of being beholden to “cultural norms that favor male dominance,” according to the society. They insist they are not “Koreaphobes”, but critics note that many of them are blatantly anti-Korean men. The women, too, have come under fire for dressing in a manner many viewed as purposely provocative to Korean mores after moving to the United States.
“The Korean Wife-Beaters community has been very nervous and scared,” the Reverend John Hale said. “Tension has been very high.”
And you know what happens when wife-beaters are tense. I hate wife-beaters as much as anyone, but you have to be realistic. If their dress and leaving their husbands was intended as bait, it worked.
- Abuse in the Land of Promise: Sandhya Somashekhar at The Washington Post
- “For Immigrant Women Caught in Violent Relationships, Escape is Especially Difficult”
- Event organizer offers no apology after thwarted attack in Texas: Sandhya Somashekhar at The Washington Post
- “Pamela Geller, the woman behind the Texas cartoon contest attacked by two gunmen late Sunday, knew what she was doing when she staged the controversial event featuring irreverent depictions of the prophet Muhammad in Garland, Tex.” (Memeorandum thread)
- Of Feet and Knees: Sarah Hoyt at According To Hoyt
- “Of course, Christians don’t do that. At most they would show up at pray at you. And that would be considered hateful and closed minded, and people would talk about being intimidated going into the art show.”
- Two Contradictory Claims the Left Urges On Us: Ace at Ace of Spades HQ
- “1. Islam is compatible with Western values. 2. We're going to have to change some core Western values to avoid violence from our new Muslim friends.”
- Washington Post “Social Change Reporter" On Garland Shooting: "If the event was intended as bait, it worked.”: Ace at Ace of Spades HQ
- “If someone starts shooting up the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, the gay cross-dressing attack on Christians, will the Washington Post likewise write that those shot down had held themselves out to be ‘bait’?”
More free speech
- The enduring hate speech of Stephen Douglas in Canada
- If the right hasn’t changed much since Abraham Lincoln, the left hasn’t changed much since Stephen Douglas. They still believe that it’s their responsibility to control the rest of us.
- First, CNN came for InfoWars
- “When the speech condemns a free press, you are hearing the words of a tyrant.”
- Civil rights vs. showboat killers
- If we want to take away people’s civil rights to stop the showboat killers that seem to have proliferated since Columbine, is it worth it?
- Being illiberal: Same sex gun sales
- If selling a gay couple a wedding cake means a “christian” baker participated in their marriage, does selling a gun to a murderer mean a “christian” gun store owner participated in murder?
- Shed a tear for Democracy
- Public Citizen is outraged that the Supreme Court sides with free speech. Their version of democracy, with a capital D, is government control over every aspect of a candidate’s campaign (government funding) and the candidate’s supporters (subjecting supporter advertisements to FEC whims).
- One more page with the topic free speech, and other related pages
More Washington Post
- An outdated code of conduct
- This social code once stood at the entrance to the Washington Post.
- The Hillary Clinton e-mail ‘scandal’ that isn’t
- There’s no there here, and it doesn’t affect her campaign. Nothing in the law says felons can’t be President.
- The child sex of the anointed
- There’s nothing so uncommon as common sense in DC, and the Washington Post epitomizes the nonsensical vision of the anointed with Betsy Karasik’s article proposing legalizing sex between high school teachers and high school students “absent extenuating circumstances”.
- April fools came early at the Washington Post
- The left-wing media have been omitting the truth for so long, they no longer remember the omissions.
Syndicated from The Washington Post.